Attack as a leadership tool
April 17, 2008 by Miki Saxon
Post from Leadership Turn Image credit: http://www.sxc.hu/profile/alex_t
As I’ve written in the past, I don’t see politicians as leaders, in fact, I find the two terms oxymoronic.
But since society chooses to view them in the light of leadership and they promote themselves in the guise of leaders I think the idea of attack as a leadership tool is valid.
In the final debate, what do Clinton’s constant attacks say about her confidence and willingness to do anything to win?
What does Obama’s lack of retaliation say? Should he have retaliated in kind?
What do you think?
Your comments—priceless
You don’t view politicians as LEADERS? Then, what else are they if they tell us their vision and lay a path of guidance to show how we’re going to get there? Now maybe they’re not GOOD paths, but paths they are nontheless.
Bridget, A dog can show a path, doesn’t make it a leader:) My thoughts on politicians are here