Comments on: What leaders DON’T: fool around

By: Miki Saxon

Miki Saxon — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 05:19:57 +0000

Hi John, thanks for visiting and adding to the discussion.

If you define ‘leader’ based on position, then they were. If you define it based on actions and authenticity then there are gaps.

So I suppose that you can say they were leaders at times and weren’t at other times—like the rest of us poor mortals.

I hope you’ll return to read the post I’m doing on this later in the week.

By: John

John — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:01:40 +0000

Were JFKennedy and Bill Clinton leaders? They had their foolish moments (and an underlying arrogance towards women).

By: Miki Saxon

Miki Saxon — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:53:31 +0000

Tom, read my follow-up post on March 17.

I’m far more concerned about the actions of the Feds—an organization with no leaders of character whatsoever.

By: The NONexistence of American leadership

The NONexistence of American leadership — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:15:20 +0000

[...] a post about the repercussions of sexual peccadilloes I said, “I’m also wondering how many other [...]

By: Tom Magness

Tom Magness — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:30:50 +0000

Miki

I’ve been visiting DC over the last several weeks — the first time during the Roger Clemens hearings and the second during the NY Governor downfall. Two observations:

– People love a controversy. They (and the media) can seemingly care less about the important issues facing our nation!

– It is amazing what stupid things people will do for temporary gain. The higher they are…the harder they fall.

Leaders of character are still in high demand! Hooah!